Author:
DECREUX YVAN,FONTAGNÉ LIONEL
Abstract
AbstractWhat are the lessons from the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) from a forward-looking point of view? A decade of negotiations is likely to go nowhere. This paper argues that absence of a landing-zone was in the data. Quantitative tools modelling the detail of the modalities predicted failure but were not taken seriously: the design of the negotiations implied that any achievements of the Round could only be limited. Such a weakness was induced by the way multilateral negotiations were organized – in separate groups, without much consideration for, or understanding of, how the different elements added up to more than the sum of the parts. We put sensible figures on that argument by using a dynamic computable general equilibrium model of the world economy, addressing exceptions, flexibilities, as well as the non-linear design of the liberalization formulas, a reduction in domestic support, the phasing out of export subsidies in agriculture, and trade facilitation. Our conclusion is that negotiators have to go back to simplicity and re-bundle the topics if they wish to revamp multilateral negotiations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference24 articles.
1. Decreux Y. and M. P. Ramos (2007), How Does Tariff-Rate Quota Modelling Affect CGE Results? An Application for MIRAGE, TradeAg Working Paper 2007–16.
2. Karmakar S. (2013), ‘Life after Bali: Renewing the World Trade Agenda’, Bruegel Policy Contribution 2013/17.
3. Bagwell K. and R. W. Staiger (2011), Can the Doha Round Be a Development Round? Setting a Place at the Table, NBER Working Paper 17650.
4. Formulas for Failure;Laborde;World Trade Review,2015
5. Trade Liberalization in the Doha Development Round;Francois;Economic Policy,2005
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献