Author:
Kostakopoulou Dora,Schrauwen Annette
Abstract
AbstractThe increasing mobility of athletes prompts a reconsideration of the presumed connection between allegiance, identity and nationality. Olympic citizenship challenges traditional understandings of community membership by calling into question the privileged status of birthright citizenship and by bringing forth a different, more fluid and changeable notion of belonging. By juxtaposing the ‘old’ world of nations competing via ‘their’ athletes, as momentary representatives of the nation, for glory, medals, dominance and prestige, to the increasing mobility of sportspersons engaging in the pursuit of athletic excellence and creative self-expression, we argue that neither the enactment of tighter rules to prevent ‘citizenship shopping’ nor the transformation of the Olympic Games into athletes' Olympics are desirable reforms. Instead, we propose a participatory growth model which would allow athletes to choose the country they intend to represent following their enmeshment into a localised web of socio-economic interactions and a flexible framework of citizenship. This cannot but have wider implications for the Olympic Charter and for politics in general.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference84 articles.
1. Ziller J. (2010) Free Movement of European Union Citizens and Employment in the Public Sector: Current Issues and State of Play (Report for the European Commission). Brussels: European Commission.
2. Anti-Doping Revisited – the Demise of the Rule of “Purely Sporting Interest?”;Weatherill;European Competition Law Review,2006
3. Olympic spectacle: opening ceremonies and some paradoxes of globalization
4. Back to the Very First Day: Eighty Years of Politics in the Olympic Games
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献