Abstract
Now that the statutes formerly ascribed to Winchelsey and Reynolds have been shown to derive from other sources, those of John Stratford, issued after the Second Council of London (1342), are seen to stand out as the most significant body of provincial legislation in the later Middle Ages. Their relative importance is enhanced by the paucity of such legislation in this period in comparison with the considerable volume produced in the course of the thirteenth century.On investigation, Stratford’s constitutions appear significant in the corpus of medieval ‘administrative’ canon law. Not only do they show signs of the friction existing between the lay and ecclesiastical jurisdictions and experienced both by Pecham and Winchelsey, but also of the recurring clerical concerns, frailties of conduct, and malpractices of church courts and officials alike. Provincial legislation springs partly from local imperfections, and partly from more general circumstances. Political considerations may have been critical in the decision to issue constitutions. There is justification, therefore, for first examining the political context in which these constitutions arose.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History
Reference22 articles.
1. The So-Called Statutes of John Pecham and Robert Winchel sey;Cheney;JEH,1961
2. The Oculus Sacerdotis and some other works of William of Pagula;Boyle;TRHS,1955
3. Kings, Courts, Cures, and Sinecures: The Statute of Provisors and the Common Law
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain;CAMB HIST BOOK BRIT;2008-03-27
2. Plates 2;The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain;2008-03-27
3. Plates 1;The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain;2008-03-27
4. Bibliography;The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain;2008-03-27
5. Illustration and ornament;The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain;2008-03-27