Abstract
Abstract
In its nearly 80-year history, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) has shifted from a “whalers club” to an international governance body chiefly focused on the protection and conservation of global cetacean populations. Drawing on recent scholarship on extinction and its entanglements, this article compares two addresses given by whalers at IWC meetings 40 years apart to problematise the way whaling and its relation to extinction is conceptualised in international environmental governance. Guided by practice-oriented document analysis and recent theorisation of extinction as an entangled process, this article analyses the personal stakeholder testimonies from two different representatives of the North Slope whalers of Northern Alaska to the IWC – one in relation to the 1977 Alaska bowhead whaling controversy and the other in the context of the 2018 negotiations over streamlining Aboriginal Subsistence Whaling management and supporting greater flexibility and Indigenous autonomy. By comparing these two statements from very different points of history for the IWC and the governance of Indigenous whaling, this article illustrates some of the ongoing struggles for environmental governance to recognise extinction as a complex, multifaceted process that reverberates throughout human and more-than-human communities.
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference54 articles.
1. Articulating indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot;Li;Comparative Studies in Society and History,2000
2. Native American Whalemen and the World
3. Becoming common plantain: metaphor, settler responsibility, and decolonizing tourism
4. Integrating indigenous rights into multilateral environmental agreements: The international whaling commission and aboriginal subsistence whaling;Wold;Boston College International and Comparative Law Review,2017