Abstract
In Arabic philosophic texts, and following them also in Hebrew philosophic texts, restatements of Aristotle's distinction between ‘equivocal’ (ὁμώνυμα, mushtarakah) and ‘univocal’ (συνώνυμα, mutawāṭi'ah), terms usually contain another type of term which stands midway between these two. It is called ‘ambiguous’ or ‘amphibolous’ (mushakkikah) terms. So far no adequate explanation as to the origin of this type of term has been advanced. In the latest and most important study of the subject, the problem of its origin has been left unsolved. To solve this problem as well as to account for the various treatments of ambiguous terms in Arabic philosophy, including Alfarabi, Avicenna, Algazali, Averroes and Maimonides, is the purpose of this paper.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Anthropomorphism according to Al-Ghazali (d. 1111) and Maimonides (d. 1204): A comparative discourse;HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies;2023-05-22
2. Translation and the promise of analogy;Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies;2022-09-02
3. Bibliography;The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy;2008-12-15
4. Biobibliographical Appendix;The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy;2008-12-15
5. Divine Law and Human Practices;The Cambridge History of Jewish Philosophy;2008-12-15