Suicide Bombing Terrorism

Author:

Tin DerrickORCID,Galehan Jordan,Markovic Vesna,Ciottone Gregory R.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction:While suicide bombings in the context of warfare have existed throughout history, there was an exponential rise in such attacks in the decade following the initiation of the War on Terror. The health care implications of such attacks are a growing concern across the emergency response sector, and this study is an epidemiological examination of all terrorism-related bombings sustained from 1970-2019, comparing the rates of fatal injuries (FI) and non-fatal injuries (NFI) between suicide bombing attacks (SBA) versus non-suicide bombing attacks (NSBA).Method:Data collection was performed using a retrospective database search through the Global Terrorism Database (GTD). The GTD database was downloaded and searched using the internal database search functions for all events that occurred from January 1, 1970 - December 31, 2019. Bombing/explosion as a primary “attack type” and explosives as a primary “weapon type” were selected for the purpose of this study, and events were further sub-classified as either “suicide attack” or “non-suicide attack.” Results were exported into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp.; Redmond, Washington USA) for analysis.Findings:There were 82,217 bombing/explosion terrorist attacks using explosives documented during the study period with 135,807 fatalities and 352,500 NFI.A total of 5,416 events (6.59% of all events) were sub-classified as SBA causing 52,317 FI (38.52% of all FI) and 107,062 NFI (30.37% of all NFI).Mean SBA FI was 9.66 per event and mean SBA NFI was 19.77 per event compared to a mean NSBA FI of 1.09 per event and mean NSBA NFI of 3.20 per event.Conclusion:Suicide bombing attacks are a unique terrorist methodology that can inflict wide-spread psychological damage as well as significantly higher death and injury tolls when compared to more traditional NSBA. They have been increasing in popularity amongst terrorist organizations and groups, and Counter-Terrorism Medicine (CTM) specialists need to be aware of the unique injury patterns and potential risk mitigation strategies associated with SBA depending on the target type, location, and gender of the perpetrator.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Emergency Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. 15. Ganor, B. The rationality of the Islamic radical suicide attack phenomenon. Int Inst Counter-Terrorism. 2007. https://www.ict.org.il/Article/973/TheRationalityoftheIslamicRadicalSuicideattackphenomenon#gsc.tab=0. Accessed June 3, 2021.

2. 37. Tin, D. Enhancing medical preparedness to meet the changing threat of terrorism. The Strategist. 2021. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/enhancing-medical-preparedness-to-meet-the-changing-threat-of-terrorism/. Accessed April 24, 2021.

3. 6. Kiras, J. Suicide Bombing. Britannica. 2011. https://www.britannica.com/topic/suicide-bombing. Accessed April 12, 2021.

4. 14. Markovic, V. Suicide bombings and lethality: a statistical analysis of tactics, techniques and procedures. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2009. https://www.worldcat.org/title/suicide-bombings-and-lethality-a-statistical-analysis-of-tactics-techniques-and-procedures/oclc/436171062. Accessed June 3, 2021.

5. 13. Codebook: Inclusion Criteria and Variables. College Park, Maryland USA: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism; 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3