Risk Profiling of the Solomon Technique versus Selective Technique of Fetoscopic Laser Surgery for Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Abstract

AbstractWe evaluated the outcomes and adverse events after fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using the Solomon technique in comparison to the selective technique. A retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive cohort of FLS-treated TTTS using the selective (January 2010 to July 2014) and Solomon (August 2014 to December 2017) techniques was performed. Among 395 cases, 227 underwent selective coagulation and 168 underwent the Solomon technique. The incidence rates of recurrent TTTS (Solomon vs. selective: 0% vs. .9%, p = .510) and twin anemia–polycythemia sequence (.6% vs. .4%, p = .670) were very low in both groups. The incidence rates of placental abruption (Solomon vs. selective: 10.7% vs. 3.5%, p = .007) and preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM) with subsequent delivery before 32 weeks (20.2% vs. 7.1%, p < .001) were higher in the Solomon group. The median birth recipient weight was significantly smaller in the Solomon group (1790 g vs. 1933 g, p = .049). The rate of survival of at least one twin was significantly higher in the Solomon group (98.2% vs. 93.8%, p = .046). The Solomon technique and total laser energy were significant risk factors for pPROM (odds ratio: 2.64, 1.07, 95% CI [1.32, 5.28], [1.01, 1.13], p = .006, p = .014, respectively). These findings suggest that the Solomon technique led to superior survival outcomes but increased risks of placental abruption, pPROM and fetal growth impairment. Total laser energy was associated with the occurrence of pPROM. Close attention to adverse events is required for perinatal management after FLS to treat TTTS using the Solomon technique.