Author:
WILLMOTT Lindy,WHITE Ben,STACKPOOLE Christopher,THEN Shih-Ning,MAN Hongjie,YU Mei,SHEN Weixing
Abstract
AbstractThis article compares the Australian and Chinese adult guardianship systems, and considers whether there is potential for drawing on some (or many) aspects of the Australian model for the Chinese legal framework. Australia has a well-developed guardianship framework that provides mechanisms for making healthcare decisions when an adult is no longer able to do so. This framework has evolved over many years and, in some cases, individuals can decide about medical treatment in advance of the situation arising, or who should be the decision-maker if he or she later loses capacity. The current Chinese legal framework, on the other hand, is a fragmented one and comprises laws that were not designed to deal with how healthcare decisions can be made for a person without capacity. This article outlines the legal framework in both jurisdictions and considers whether, having regard to the fact that these two countries have different values and cultures, there are features of the Australian guardianship system that could inform the development of Chinese law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference44 articles.
1. Plenary Guardianship: An Analysis, a Critique and a Proposal for Reform;Frolik;Arizona Law Review,1981
2. Empowerment and decision-making for people with dementia: The use of legal interventions in Scotland
3. Cultural Distance between China and US Across GLOBE Model and Hofstede Model;Shi;International Business Management,2011
4. The Limits and the Social Legacy of Guardianship in Australia;Carney;Federal Law Review,1989
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献