Abstract
AbstractAn expert panel formed by Stop Ecocide International has proposed an amendment to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court which, if adopted, would create a new international crime of ecocide. However, the panel's proposal is compromised throughout by anthropocentrism in the sense that it places too much emphasis on the needs of humans and not enough on the needs of the environment. It is argued here that this anthropocentric dilution of ecocide resulted from the panel's lack of standing, influence and confidence on the international stage. Its weakness pushed it towards a strategy of producing something palatable to states in the hope of securing their support. That strategy will prove futile. The article considers whether other actors, such as the international courts or experts working in different contexts, might be better placed to design the blueprint for ecocide. It concludes, tentatively, that the International Law Commission remains the architect best positioned to set out a bold vision of ecocide.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference12 articles.
1. Environmental Warfare and Ecocide — Facts, Appraisal, and Proposals
2. Seed-Idea: Seeding Intrinsic Values: How a Law of Ecocide Will Shift Our Consciousness;Higgins;Cadmus,2012
3. A Rule Book on the Shelf? Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice
4. Lex Lata Comes with a Date; Or, What Follows from Referring to the “Tallinn Rules”?;Boer;American Journal of International Law,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献