Abstract
Two questions are central in the law of contracts: first, what are the conditions necessary to the formation of a contract; second, what is the scope of the contractual obligation. The first question deals with the two basic requirements for the formation of a contract — offer and acceptance, whose substantive components are the intention to form a legal obligation and definiteness. It also deals with the substantive requirement of writing, in those classes of contracts in which it is required, and the requirement of consideration, in those legal systems in which it exists. The second question deals with those rules which determine the remedies for breach of contract such as specific performance, damages and restitution. In this article I shall try to identify and evaluate recent trends in Israeli law concerning these questions, as demonstrated by decisions of the Israeli Supreme Court, and to evaluate these trends by measuring their consistency with one another.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference95 articles.
1. The Doctrines of Good Faith and Culpa in Contrahendo in the Law of Contract;Hofar;Mishpatim,1975
2. Section 8 of the Land Law, 1969 — The Essence of a Written Agreement and the Status of Verbal Agreements;Cohen;Mishpatim,1981
3. Contract Rules and Good Faith in Bargaining: Formalism v. Principles of Justice;Cohen;HaPraklit,1986
4. Efficiency, Exchange, and Auction: Philosophic Aspects of the Economic Approach to Law
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献