Abstract
Responses to hate crimes, hate incidents and hate speech are characterised by an exceptional fragmentation in terminology and lack of coordination among governmental and non-governmental organisations. This article proposes a new conceptual framework to map the diversity of responses to hate crime, hate incidents and hate speech, with the aim of assessing gaps and needs in this important policy area. Using Australia as a case study, we create and analyse a database of 222 organisations running activities focusing on tackling hate against different target groups. The results highlight an uneven distribution of efforts across different geographical areas, types of activities and target groups. The majority of anti-hate efforts, especially by government organisations, focus on awareness raising and education rather than victim support and data collection. Racial and religious hate are the main foci of anti-hate efforts, compared to other forms of hate, such as anti-LGBTIQ+ and disablist hate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference54 articles.
1. Crimes Amendment (Publicly Threatening and Inciting Violence) Act (2018) No. 32.
2. Asian Australian Alliance (2020) COVID-19 Coronavirus Racism Incident Report, http://diversityarts.org.au/app/uploads/COVID19-racism-incident-report-Preliminary-Official.pdf [accessed 27.07.2021].
3. United Nations (UN) (2020) ‘COVID-19: UN counters pandemic-related hate and xenophobia’, Department of Global Communications, https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/covid-19-un-counters-pandemic-related-hate-and-xenophobia [accessed 27.07.21].
4. From Hate to Prejudice: Does the New Terminology of Prejudice Motivated Crime Change Perceptions and Reporting Actions?
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献