Abstract
The current article provides comparative analysis of policy capabilities in COVID-19 response in Russia and Finland by examining key challenges and impacts of the pandemic, and effects of anti-crisis socio-economic measures. It finds that the two countries adopted diverse policy responses that prioritised different segments of society with corresponding budget allocations. Such policy choice has been underpinned by pre-existing national priorities, while largely leveraging established policy legacy, institutions, and instruments within their welfare models. Russia has focused on supporting households through pro-natalist social assistance in line with its demographic concerns and persistent poverty, whereas Finland concentrated on protecting employment via social insurance and labour market interventions amid declining working-age population and labour supply. It is further suggested that improving policy capabilities via investments in comprehensive social security, welfare systems and gender-responsive policies can contribute to better development outcomes, while addressing gender power imbalances in the post-COVID-19 era.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Gender, work, and childcare in Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Russia
2. The
COVID
‐19 crisis and policy responses by continental European welfare states
3. Giattino, C. , Ritchie, H. , Roser, M. , Ortiz-Ospina, E. and Hasell, J. (2021) ‘Excess mortality during the coronavirus pandemic’, Our World in Data, https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid [accessed 6.11.2021]
4. Finnish Government (2020b) Strengthening Wellbeing and Equality During and After Coronavirus Crisis, Helsinki: Publications of the Finnish Government 2020:27.
5. Nordic welfare states—still standing or changed by the
COVID
‐19 crisis?
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献