Disruptive Innovation in Health Care: Business Models, Moral Orders and Electronic Records

Author:

Garrety Karin,McLoughlin Ian,Zelle Gregor

Abstract

There is widespread consensus that current healthcare costs are unsustainable, and that efficiencies could be achieved by reorganising care and making greater use of information technology, in particular nationally available electronic health records. Such approaches have, however, been difficult to implement, partly because incentives for uptake are weak. In this article we argue that the difficulties go deeper than calculations of costs and benefits, and include disruptions to the complex moral orders that surround the production and exchange of health information. Using the introduction of national electronic health records in England and Australia as examples, we show how attempts to reshape and transfer distributions of rights and responsibilities developed in the age of paper into the digital world go awry. We suggest that a fundamental rethinking of the role of ‘records’ in healthcare may be an integral component of the moral re-ordering required to transform health care through such means.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science

Reference85 articles.

1. Collins T. (2006) ‘Experts strike new NHS warning note’, ComputerWeekly.com, 10 October, http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2006/10/10/218985/Experts-strike-new-NHS-warning-note.htm (accessed 8 March 2011).

2. Anonymous (2007) ‘BMA votes for non-co-operation on central records’, E-Health Insider, 29 June, http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/ehi/2827/bma_votes_for_non_co-operation_on_central_records (accessed 27 May 2013).

3. Anonymous (2005) ‘No single opt-out on medical records database’, E-Health Insider, 8 March, http://www.ehi.co.uk/news/ehi/1080 (accessed 27 April 2011).

4. Carlisle D. (2011) ‘All very SUSpicious’, E-Health Insider, 21 April, http://www.ehi.co.uk/insight/analysis/727/all-very-suspicious (accessed 14 June 2011).

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3