Abstract
The intensification of behavioural requirements and punitive measures in unemployment benefits by UK governments has been popular and instrumental to the politics of welfare reform. Yet there is scant research into the politics of extending this approach to working households, known as ‘in-work conditionality’ (IWC), which was introduced in the UK under Universal Credit in 2012. Addressing this gap, we examine the preferences of political parties and voters towards IWC, using data from an online survey of 1,111 adults in 2017, party manifestos and parliamentary debates. While we find evidence of a partisan split between voters and politicians on the left (oppose IWC) and right (support IWC), intra-party divides and the relative infancy of IWC suggests the politics of IWC is not set in stone. This helps to explain the blame avoidance strategies of current and previous Conservative governments responsible for IWC.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Langenbucher, K. (2015) ‘How demanding are eligibility criteria for unemployment benefits, quantitative indicators for OECD and EU countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 166, Paris: OECD Publishing.
2. Changing public support for welfare sanctioning in Britain and the Netherlands: A persuasion experiment
3. Review Article: Rethinking Party Politics and the Welfare State – Recent Advances in the Literature
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献