Abstract
ABSTRACTThe misalignment of goals among researchers, external organizational partners (OPs), and study participants is thought to pose a challenge to the successful implementation of collaborative research projects. However, the goals of different collaborative team members almost never are elicited, making identification of misalignment and its potential consequences a difficult task. In this evaluation of a United Nations Nonviolent Communication Program conducted in Bangladesh, the Maldives, and Sri Lanka, I collected qualitative and quantitative data on OPs’ and study participants’ expected program impacts. I find that there are differences in OP and participant goals and that misalignment appears to bear some responsibility for participant dissatisfaction with the program. I also observe evidence that as the program progressed, participants’ expected program impacts began to more closely approximate those of the OPs. I conclude with thoughts on the benefits of explicitly measuring research team goals and expectations and addressing their misalignment.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference13 articles.
1. On design-based empirical research and its interpretation and ethics in sustainability science
2. Facilitating Field Experiments at the Subnational Level
3. What, Where, Who, And Why? An Empirical Investigation of Positionality in Political Science Field Experiments;Corduneanu-Huci;PS: Political Science and Politics,2022
4. Emerging Models of Collaboration in Political Science: Changes, Benefits, and Challenges;McDermott;PS: Political Science and Politics,2010