Abstract
ABSTRACTResearchers often want to increase the broader societal impact of their work. One way to do that is to discuss research findings directly with practitioners. Yet, such interactions are voluntary and do not regularly arise, which raises a key demand question: Under what conditions do practitioners want to connect with researchers? This article shows that relational considerations affect these decisions—that is, what practitioners expect the interaction will be like. I partnered with a US-based civic association to conduct a field experiment. I find that group leaders in this association are more likely to speak with researchers after learning that the researchers will (1) efficiently share information during the interaction, and (2) value practitioners’ knowledge. The results provide actionable guidance for how researchers should approach practitioners and also demonstrate one powerful way that social science evidence can inform efforts to bridge research and practice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference31 articles.
1. The Polarizing Effect of the March for Science on Attitudes toward Scientists;Motta;PS: Political Science and Politics,2018
2. How Organizations Develop Activists
3. Research Impact Through Matchmaking (RITM): Why and How to Connect Researchers and Practitioners;Levine;PS: Political Science and Politics,2020a
4. Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010;Gauchat;American Sociological Review,2012
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献