Abstract
ABSTRACTWikipedia is a powerful tool that reinforces dominant knowledge paradigms, especially those emanating from the Global North. Simultaneously, it has subversive potential to challenge these paradigms, offering a far-reaching platform to voices that have been traditionally marginalized and underserved. Despite this potential, instructors often employ an “abstinence approach” to Wikipedia, telling students to avoid using it in their academic work. This article advocates for active engagement with Wikipedia with the aim of challenging bias resulting from omission or underrepresentation of particular material to develop more diverse, publicly accessible political science content. First, I explain the theoretical objectives of the assignment and describe its structure. Then I reflect on its successes, challenges, and possible modifications.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference24 articles.
1. “Wikipedia’s Politics of Exclusion: Gender, Epistemology, and Feminist Rhetorical (In)action;Gruwell;Computers and Composition,2015
2. “The Heart Work of Wikipedia: Gendered, Emotional Labor in the World’s Largest Online Encyclopedia;Menking;CHI 2015—Crossings,2015
3. Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage;Brown;PS: Political Science and Politics,2011
4. Where Are the Women in Wikipedia? Understanding the Different Psychological Experiences of Men and Women in Wikipedia;Collier;Sex Roles,2016
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献