Abstract
Educators often use role-playing exercises that involve problem based
learning in their courses to improve their students' critical and
analytical skills, introduce them to new ways of thinking, increase
interaction with their fellow students, and to enhance student
interest in course lessons and materials (Greening 1998; Albanese 1993; Hensley 1993).A popular role playing simulation is moot court
(Deardoff and Aliotta 2003; Guiliuzza 1991). Moot courts are
academic simulations of appellate advocacy that educate students
about the law and the judicial process. Students, acting as lawyers
or judges, “try” a case before an appellate court.2 In addition to
acting as lawyers or judges, students are assigned to serve as “law
clerks, reporters, or amicus brief writers” (Knerr
and Sommerman 2001, 4). Moot court is an
extremely fluid pedagogical tool which can be used for more than
learning about the law or the judicial process. It has been used in
a variety of disciplines including political science, media,
history, journalism, sociology, art, economics, business, and the
life sciences to educate students about a variety of subjects such
as history, journalistic rights, anti-trust laws, or professional
ethics (Carlson and Skaggs 2000; Dhooge
1999; Bentley 1996).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference27 articles.
1. Curran Jeanne , Susan Takata , and Patricia Acone . 2000. “Moot Court: Thinking on Your Feet.” Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
2. Deardorff Michelle Donaldson , and Jilda Aliotta . 2000. “Playing Justice: The Role of Simulation in Teaching and Assessing the Teaching of Public Law.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
3. Collins Edward , and Martin Rogoff . 1991. “Uses of an Inter-Scholastic Moot Court Competition in the Teaching of International Law.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (3): 516– 520.
4. Canon Bradley C. 1997. “Simulating the Certiorari Process.” Law and Courts 8: 3– 6.
5. Knerr Charles R. 2002. “Costs and Benefits of Undergraduate Moot Court: A Literature Review.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Providence.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Undergraduate Research in Legal Studies;The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research;2022-07-07
2. Disciplines A–Z;The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research;2022-07-07