Abstract
Cristina Masters (CM): The articles in this forum speak to how influential and inspiring your work is for scholars in the discipline of International Relations (IR), not least feminist scholars. Particularly, I think, for encouraging us to (re)think and (re)work with deeply familiar ‘things’ in deeply unusual – yet troublingly fecund – ways. Blood, for example, comes up quite frequently in your writing on methodology, even though it appears, as you say, an ‘unlikely candidate for methodological use’. What is so promising about blood for making sense of global politics?
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Rethinking silence, gender, and power in insecure sites: Implications for feminist security studies in a postcolonial world
2. Feminist methodology between theory and praxis
3. Feminist standpoint theory meets International Relations theory;Zalewski;The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs,1993
4. Where is the woman in feminist theory? The case of aesthetics;Hein;Philosophic Exchange,1990
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献