Abstract
AbstractInstead of asking whether regional organisations can promote democracy, a well-established conclusion, this article asks what type of democracy regional organisations can promote. Where their commitments to democracy are weak, regional organisations can promote the transition away from authoritarianism but cannot drive that process to completion with the creation of embedded liberal democracies. Under such circumstances regional organisations serve as regimes of bounded toleration, and can provide regional linkages that sustain defective democracies. Through examining the relationship between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and Myanmar, three supporting roles are identified; regional legitimacy, defence from external pressure, and future-oriented accommodation. The presence of these linkages between defective democracies and regional organisations provides a caveat to the positive assessments of regional organisations as socialisers of democracy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Illiberal regimes and international organizations;The Review of International Organizations;2024-08-02
2. The Null Feminist Wave in Africa;Open Journal of Social Sciences;2024
3. The Southern African Development Community’s Noncommittal Approach to Crisis Management in Zimbabwe: The Need to Look beyond Norms;Strategic Review for Southern Africa;2022
4. Patterns of Regional Democracy, Human Rights, and Rule of Law Institutions;Regional Organizations and Democracy, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law;2022
5. Introduction;Regional Organizations and Democracy, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law;2022