Abstract
AbstractIn the realm of electoral politics, a growing number of women, African Americans, and Latinos now serve at the highest levels of government. For many Americans, the bipartisan presence of representatives who are people of color and/or women is proof that we live in a “post-feminist” and “postracial” era in which institutions are now fundamentally fair and accessible. Rather than assuming that racial presence is synonymous with racial justice, this essay turns to aesthetic theory to advocate for a new understanding of presence—not as proof that racial or gender justice has been achieved but as a kind of beauty that is experienced as a form of visible certitude. Drawing on the work of Hannah Pitkin, alongside writings on descriptive representation for Latinos and African Americans, this essay stresses the importance of judgment, arguing that on questions of social justice, a racially diverse elite is simultaneously ethically valuableandpolitically indeterminate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference34 articles.
1. Must we mean what we say?1
2. On Beauty and Being Just
3. Fox News Latino (2012). Election 2012: Ted Cruz Wins Senate Seat in Texas, Makes History. November 6. (accessed December 31, 2013).
4. Corn David (2011). Obama’s Secret Plot to Bring 100 Million Muslims to the US: Behold the Mother of All Anti-Obama Conspiracy Theories. Mother Jones, Feb. 25. (accessed December 31, 2013).
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献