Author:
Strother Logan,Piston Spencer,Ogorzalek Thomas
Abstract
AbstractDebates about the meaning of Southern symbols such as the Confederate battle emblem are sweeping the nation. These debates typically revolve around the question of whether such symbols represent “heritage or hatred:” racially innocuous Southern pride or White prejudice against Blacks. In order to assess these competing claims, we first examine the historical reintroduction of the Confederate flag in the Deep South in the 1950s and 1960s; next, we analyze three survey datasets, including one nationally representative dataset and two probability samples of White Georgians and White South Carolinians, in order to build and assess a stronger theoretical account of the racial motivations underlying such symbols than currently exists. While our findings yield strong support for the hypothesis that prejudice against Blacks bolsters White support for Southern symbols, support for the Southern heritage hypothesis is decidedly mixed. Despite widespread denials that Southern symbols reflect racism, racial prejudice is strongly associated with support for such symbols.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference56 articles.
1. Is Implicit Prejudice against Blacks Politically Consequential? Evidence from the AMP
2. Atlanta Journal and the Atlanta Constitution (1952). The Confederate Battle Flag Never Was Official. Mar 16.
3. The Race Race in Black and White: The 1995 Louisiana Gubernatorial Elections;Orey;Southeastern Political Review,1998
4. Heritage versus Hate: A Geographical Analysis of Georgia's Confederate Battle Flag Debate
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献