Abstract
Coliforms were readily obtained from many soils. In samples taken from sites exposed to animal contaminationBact. colitype I occurred predominantly. A large number of samples taken from grassy banks, only remotely exposed to contamination, were found to contain intermediates. It was found that the greater the probable degree of contamination of the soil the higher was the proportion ofBact. colitype I, and that the less the probable degree of contamination the higher was the proportion of intermediates. It is difficult to explain this merely on the basis of the prolonged survival of intermediates in soil, and it would appear obvious that the source of these intermediates lay elsewhere than in animal faeces. The numbers in which they were found in soil, however, were not of the order expected of bacteria living in their natural environment, and consequently it was equally difficult to conclude that these intermediates were actively established in soil.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Immunology
Reference17 articles.
1. Ministry of Health (1939). Rep. publ. Hlth med. Subj., Lond., no. 71.
2. Horrocks W. H. (1901). Bacteriological Examination of Water. Cited by Thresh, Beale & Suckling (1949).
3. An Ecological Study of the Coliform Bacteria
4. COLI-AEROGENES BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM GRASS
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献