Author:
Brooks Eleanor,Geyer Robert
Abstract
AbstractInnovation in the development of new drugs has to balance the needs of health actors and administrators, the pharmaceutical industry and patients. Differing perspectives on what constitutes an innovation, where research and development should be directed and how new drugs should be evaluated and priced cause ongoing tensions within the regulatory framework. In the current climate, where Europe’s health systems face rising demand for health services and increasingly restricted resources, the efficiency of pharmaceutical regulation and drug development is under even greater scrutiny. How can regulation foster innovation and industry growth while also serving the public health needs of society, and what is the EU’s role in pursuing this objective? Drawing on a provision which formerly existed in Norwegian pharmaceutical legislation, this article explores the potential of a medical need clause (MNC) in addressing these issues. In restricting market authorisations to those drugs that offer an added therapeutic value, might a MNC foster innovation and spending efficiency in Europe’s health systems?
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference39 articles.
1. Wieseler B. (2011), ‘How, and on whose behalf, should the ‘added therapeutic value’ of a new drug be assessed?’ Pilule d’Or Prescrire, conference debate, http://www.prescrire.org/Docu/Archive/docus/WieselerENPiluleOrPrescrire2011.pdf [13 October 2014].
2. Response to Michael Wonder’s comments on the article ‘Assessment of the therapeutic value of new medicines marketed in Australia’
3. Raftery J. (2014), ‘Sofosbufir for hepatitis C – moving to country specific prices’, British Medical Journal Blog, published online 20 August 2014.
4. Value based pricing: can it work?
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献