Author:
Costa-Font Joan,Sato Azusa,Rovira Forns Joan
Abstract
AbstractPublicly funded health system reforms increasingly require the evaluation of competing programmes. However, programmes are made of multi-dimensional attributes of value (where value refers to latent expectations of health system improvement). This paper identifies the design, implementation and validation of a methodology to elicit health system values to guide health care priority setting. The exercise suggests that the proposed methodology is suitable for eliciting and validating health system values, and its findings show that pursuing health gain alone does not fully capture the dimensions of health system value. More specifically, we identify a list of health system values (elicited by both potential and actual users) and classify them in terms of process-related values (e.g., shorter waiting lists, greater choice, etc.) and improvements in health system equity in addition to value derived from health gain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference17 articles.
1. A Conceptual Framework to Measure Performance of the Public Health System
2. Framework for assessing the performance of health systems;Murray;Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2000
3. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia
4. 1. Center for Healthcare Decisions (2006), 'Getting good value: consumers debate costly treatments-is the gain worth the expense? [Internet]. Rancho Cordova (CA): The Center (was Sacramento Healthcare Decisions)
5. 2. [cited 2010 Sep 29]. Available from: http://chcd.org/docs/ggv_report.pdf
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献