Author:
Ofer-Friedman Hadas,Shefler Coral,Sharma Sarit,Tirosh Amit,Tal-Jasper Ruthy,Kandipalli Deepthi,Sharma Shruti,Bathina Pradeep,Kaplansky Tamir,Maskit Moran,Azouri Tal,Lazarovitch Tsilia,Zaidenstein Ronit,Kaye Keith S.,Marchaim Dror
Abstract
A recent, frequently quoted study has suggested that for bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL) Escherichia coli, treatment with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) might be equivalent to treatment with carbapenems. However, the majority of BSIs originate from the urinary tract. A multicenter, multinational efficacy analysis was conducted from 2010 to 2012 to compare outcomes of patients with non-urinary ESBL BSIs who received a carbapenem (69 patients) vs those treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (10 patients). In multivariate analysis, therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with increased 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 7.9, P=.03). For ESBL BSIs of a non-urinary origin, carbapenems should be considered a superior treatment to BLBLIs.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(8):981–985
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Epidemiology
Cited by
79 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献