Abstract
Only a couple of decades ago, the prospects for socio-economic development in the Third World seemed much brighter than at present. The economic theories of the 1950s and early 1960s, at least those of the North American variety, prescribed more capital investment (from domestic and foreign sources) which then would lead to a “take-off” into sustained economic growth. Political theorists advocated Western political development as an irreversible step which would lead to modern democratic societies. Other social scientists suggested that the spread of modern values — “modernity” — to the developing world would solve the basic problems of underdevelopment. Those days of simpleminded theories were buoyed by the short-term euphoria of the decolonization process. If the political leaders of the newly-independent states were determined to achieve development, as indeed they were, it seemed possible that these strategies would lead to progressive social and economic changes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference44 articles.
1. Ethnic and Socio-economic Patterns in Malaysia;Aries;International Labour Review,1971
2. Fujimoto Akimo , “Land Tenure and Land Reform in Malaysian Rice Production”,Unpublished paper presented at the Second Colloquium of the Malaysia Society of the Asian Studies Association of Australiaat Townsville, 29–31 Aug. 1979
3. Women's Labour Force Participation and Socioeconomic Development: The Case of Peninsular Malaysia, 1957–1970
4. Growth and Utilization of Malaysian Labor Supply;Snodgrass;The Philippine Economic Journal,1976
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献