Abstract
AbstractThe duty to consult mandates that the Crown must consult affected Indigenous parties when Crown action may negatively impact Aboriginal rights or title claims. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has emphasized that the duty should be characterized by honourable dealings and good faith negotiations. This article argues that the concept of throughput legitimacy can help evaluate the Crown's conduct in consultation. By analyzing 131 British Columbia Environmental Assessments (BC EAs), this article finds that the Crown struggles to uphold throughput legitimacy from the perspective of Indigenous peoples, particularly in the areas of transparency, accountability and effectiveness.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference83 articles.
1. The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal People;Isaac;Alberta Law Review,2003
2. Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation
3. Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in Environmental Impact Assessment: How Can It Be Done?;Eyporsson;Arctic Review on Law and Politics,2015
4. Reasons of Identity