Abstract
AbstractThis article reports the results of a survey examining Canadians’ attitudes about political parties’ collection of personal information. Datified campaigning brings concerns about surveillance, divisiveness, digital redlining and elector autonomy. This article asks whether awareness of parties’ data collection practices affects willingness to engage with campaigns. We find (1) that respondents are not fully aware of political parties’ data collection practices, (2) that awareness of parties’ collection of personal information may reduce electors’ willingness to interact with political parties online, (3) that those who are more aware of these practices report higher levels of concern about them and that those who do not think that parties’ collection of personal information is important to the democratic process also report higher levels of concern, and (4) that new legal measures to regulate how political parties collect and use personal information are supported by respondents.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference58 articles.
1. A Comparative Analysis of the Relation Between Political Trust and Forms of Political Participation in Europe;Hooghe;European Societies,2013
2. McEvoy, Michael . 2019. “Full Disclosure: Political Parties, Campaign Data, and Voter Consent.” Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. Investigation Report P19-01. February 6. oipc.bc.ca/investigation-reports/2278.
3. Privacy, Voter Surveillance and Democratic Engagement: Challenges for Data Protection Authorities
4. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. 2019. “Briefing Note 7777-6-335754: Political Party Privacy Policy Alignment to OPC Guidance. [Released under the Access to Information Act]”.
5. What Evidence Should Social Policymakers Use?;Leigh;Economic Round-Up,2009