Author:
Johnson Genevieve Fuji,Burns Mary,Porth Kerry
Abstract
AbstractWe evaluate the Canadian parliamentary hearings on The Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act to determine whether respectful and fair deliberation occurred. Our focus is on the content, tone, and nature of each question posed by committee members in hearings in both chambers. We find that, on the whole, the vast majority of questions met this baseline but that committee members were biased toward witnesses in agreement with their position and against witnesses in opposition to it. In addition to our substantive findings, we contribute methodological insights, including a coding scheme, for this kind of qualitative text analysis.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts
2. Trusting the Process: Using an Emergent Design to Study Adult Education;Wright;Educate,2009
3. World Health Organization. 2012. “Prevention and Treatment of HIV and Other STIs for Sex Workers in Low and Middle Income Countries: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach.” Geneva: World Health Organization.
4. Prostitution as Morality Politics or Why It Is Exceedingly Difficult To Design and Sustain Effective Prostitution Policy
5. Stewart John B. 1977. The Canadian House of Commons: Procedure and Reform. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献