Author:
Goodman Nicole,Bird Karen,Gabel Chelsea
Abstract
AbstractThe research model that has dominated the discipline of political science in Canada is based on a top-down approach that defines and finds solutions to problems as researchers see them, and diminishes the real world concerns of social and political actors. Advocating a more collaborative political science, we argue for a partnership approach that engages those actors in the research process, including problem definition, research design, analysis and knowledge dissemination. This inclusion sharpens the focus of the research and produces more contextually valid and socially valuable knowledge. We draw upon our research experience working with Indigenous communities in Canada to illustrate the value of this approach, and carry out a review of partnership-based research published in The Canadian Journal of Political Science. We find little evidence of partnership-based research in our flagship journal and discuss the implications for the future of our field.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference49 articles.
1. Engagement and the Carnegie Classification System;Giles;Handbook of Engaged Scholarship: Contemporary Landscapes, Future Directions,2010
2. Recognizing Engaged Scholarship in Faculty Reward Structures: Challenges and Progress
3. Alcantara Christopher . 2015. “What is Community-Engaged Research? A Conversation with Dr. Leah Levac.” LISPOP Opinion-Policy Nexus Blog. http://lispop.ca/nexus/2015/03/11/what-community-engaged-research-conversation-dr-leah-levac (Sept. 29, 2016).
4. The Scholarship of Engagement;Boyer;Journal of Public Service and Outreach,1996
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献