The progeny testing of dairy bulls: a comparison of special station and field results

Author:

Robertson Alan,Mason I. L.

Abstract

1. A comparison has been made between progeny tests in special stations and those available from field records. The variation between sires in milk yield is much greater at the stations even when they are compared with herds at the same production level.2. In respect of yield the repeatability of station tests in the field is not good. The regression of field results on station test is only about 0·2 in herds at all production levels. For fat percentage, the regression is 0·5.3. The tests in special stations (averaging seventeen daughters per bull) were compared with those in high herds (average twenty-seven daughters) in their accuracy of prediction of the performance of bulls in the poorer herds. The field test was slightly (but not significantly) better for both milk yield and fat content.4. In milk yield, there is undoubtedly some extra variation between progeny groups at the stations which is not repeated in the field. Perhaps the tying of the heifers in distinct daughter groups in the byre may be a cause of this. However, even without this, it is doubted whether the test stations can give as much useful information on the numerical aspects of performance as the field records usually available. It is suggested that the splitting of daughter groups within the byre might increase the accuracy of the special station in the assessment of yield.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference8 articles.

1. Mason I. L. (1953). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1952, p. 106.

2. An analysis of data from the Danish bull progeny testing stations

3. British Oil and Cake Mills, Ltd. (1954). Final Report 1st Bull Progeny Test, 34 pp.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3