Abstract
SUMMARYQuantitative assessment of mitigation measures for nitrogen (N) pollution requires adequate models, good knowledge of catchment functioning and a thorough understanding of agricultural systems and stakeholder constraints. The current paper analyses a set of results from simulations, with two models, of agricultural changes in two catchments in different contexts with different constraints. The results show that reducing N inputs and increasing grassland areas are the most efficient measures, not only because they reduce N fluxes in streams but also because they enhance N use by agriculture and the whole catchment system. Introducing catch crops, hedgerows and riparian buffers are interesting complementary measures but of limited impact when implemented alone. These results are sensitive to the way mitigation measures are translated into model inputs, and their operational implications are discussed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference72 articles.
1. The effectiveness of nitrate vulnerable zones for limiting surface water nitrate concentrations
2. Vertés F. , Hatch D. , Velthof G. , Taube F. , Laurent F. , Loiseau P. & Recous S. (2007). Short-term and cumulative effects of grassland cultivation on nitrogen and carbon cycling in ley-arable rotations. In Permanent and Temporary Grassland: Plant, Environment and Economy. Proceedings of the 14th Symposium (Eds A. De Vliegher & L. Carlier ), pp. 227–246. Grassland Science in Europe vol. 12. Zurich, Switzerland: EGF.
3. Wetlands in Europe: Perspectives for restoration of a lost paradise
4. The impact of the Nitrates Directive on nitrogen emissions from agriculture in the EU-27 during 2000–2008
5. WATER QUALITY MODELING OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURAL SCENARIOS IN THE U.S. CORN BELT
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献