Abstract
AbstractSidgwick saw egoism as important and undefeated. Not long afterward, egoism is largely ignored. Immediately after Sidgwick, many arguments were given against egoism – most poor – but one argument deserves attention as both influential and plausible. Call it the “grounds objection.” It has two strands. It objects that there are justifying reasons for action other than that an action will maximize my self-interest. It also objects that sometimes, what makes an action right is a fact other than its maximizing my self-interest. I briefly explain and criticize many of the arguments given against egoism in the period, then explain and defend the grounds objection.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference74 articles.
1. Review of Ross;Smith;The Right and the Good, and Joseph, Some Problems in Ethics. Philosophical Review,1932
2. The Right and the Good. W. D. Ross
3. III.—Professor Sidgwick's Ethics
4. Critical Notice of Sir David Ross;Broad;Foundations of Ethics, Mind,1940