Abstract
If we were required to sacrifice our own interests whenever doing so was best overall, or prohibited from doing so unless it was optimal, then we would be mere sites for the realization of value. Our interests, not ourselves, would wholly determine what we ought to do. We are not mere sites for the realization of value – instead we, ourselves, matter unconditionally. So we have options to act suboptimally. These options have limits, grounded in the very same considerations. Though not merely such sites, you and I are also sites for the realization of value, and our interests (and ourselves) must therefore sometimes determine what others ought to do, in particular requiring them to bear reasonable costs for our sake. Likewise, just as my moral status grounds a requirement that others show me appropriate respect, so must I do to myself.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference37 articles.
1. Normative Strength and the Balance of Reasons
2. Famine, Affluence, and Morality;Singer;Philosophy and Public Affairs,1972
3. Actions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect;Quinn;Philosophy and Public Affairs,1989
4. If This Is My Body … : A Defence of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Opaque Options;Philosophical Studies;2024-06-21
2. Market Harms and Market Benefits;Philosophy & Public Affairs;2022-02-08
3. What’s Wrong with Automated Influence;Canadian Journal of Philosophy;2021-09-24
4. Impermissible yet Praiseworthy;Ethics;2021-07-01
5. Deontological decision theory and lesser-evil options;Synthese;2019-12-05