Abstract
AbstractDavid Boonin argues that in a choice between creating a person whose life would be well worth living and creating a different person whose life would be significantly worse, but still worth living, each option is morally permissible. I show that Boonin's argument for this view problematically implies that in a choice between creating a person whose life would be well worth living and creating another person whose life would not be worth living, each option is also morally permissible.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Reference14 articles.
1. Being and Betterness
2. Comparative Harm, Creation and Death
3. Johansson, Jens , and Risberg, Olle . Forthcoming. A Simple Analysis of Harm. Ergo.
4. The preemption problem
5. A Harm-Based Solution to the Non-Identity Problem;Gardner;Ergo,2015