Abstract
Herbicide-resistant weeds are becoming a major problem in the Midwest, and strategies must be adopted to delay further selection. Strategies of rotating and tank-mixing herbicides with different modes of actions should be effective, but adoption may be limited and certain limitations may exist. Therefore, integrating nonchemical practices that indirectly lower selection pressure or restrict the growth of resistant populations is desirable. Appropriate integration of mechanical weeding, crop rotation, increased crop competition, and decision aids may further delay the development of resistance. Understanding the effect of these practices on weed population dynamics is required to more accurately predict their contributions toward resistance management. This knowledge will aid in justifying the adoption of improved management systems.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Growers acceptance of economic thresholds for weed management in Illinois;Czapar;Weed Technol.,1997
2. Heap I. 1998. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Online. Internet. 09 September 1998. Available at www.weedscience.com.
3. Mapping risk areas for resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Manitoba
4. Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance;Gressel;Weed Technol.,1990
5. Williams B. J. 1996. Biology and Control of Wild-Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum). Ph.D. thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 206 p.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献