Abstract
Some years ago, I realized that I was the first historian of Germany hired in a tenure-track position at Amherst College. I got my job in 2000. Steeped in German history, I was surprised that a premier liberal arts college chose to hire a historian of Germany only at the very end of the twentieth century. My generation of historians of Germany often think—and other historians of Europe share our perception—that German history is a strong (if not the strongest) field in modern European history. Whether measured anecdotally by the number of job openings, the number of historians hired, the stream of published books, or the share of German history articles in academic journals, it always seems that German historians and German history are at the forefront. In fact, though, historians of Germany have always made up the smallest cohort of historians of the major European history fields (that also include British, Russian, and French history). According to the latest figures available from the American Historical Association (AHA), in 2010 there were 990 historians of Britain, 668 historians of Russia, 605 historians of France, and 592 historians of Germany in the United States.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference78 articles.
1. The Future of French History in the United States: Unapocalyptic Thoughts for the New Millennium
2. Ten Years after the ‘Remarkable Decade,’”;Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History,2011
3. Money, Space, and Time: Reflections on Graduate Education,” part of “Roundtable: Twentieth-Century British History in North America;Pedersen;Twentieth Century British History,2010
4. Holocaust Education at American Colleges and Universities: A Report on the Current Situation
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献