Abstract
Interdisciplinarity is among the most talked about but most misunderstood topics in education on all levels today. Seen as the savior of research and teaching, especially in universities, and of society, or the seeds of destruction, interdisciplinarity's proponents and critics talk past each other. Seldom do they seek common terms; typically, they mean very different approaches when they refer to interdisciplinarity. They erroneously dichotomize disciplines and interdisciplines, confuse specialization and synthesis, and misconstrue “integration.” They also date the historical turn to interdisciplinarity too late. This article critically reviews the history, historiography, and sociology of knowledge of interdisciplinarity with a focus on etiology, epistemology, definitions, relationships among and between disciplines, intellectual and institutional locations, and the organization of knowledge. A new, more historical approach to the “problem” of interdisciplinarity is proposed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),History
Reference81 articles.
1. Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680–1820
2. Interdisciplinary studies as a counterculture: Problems of birth, growth and survival;Trow;Issues in Integrative Studies,1984
3. Pfirman Stephanie L. , James P. Collins , Susan Lowes , and Anthony Michaels (2005) “Collaborative efforts: Promoting interdisciplinary scholars.” Chronicle of Higher Education, February 7.
4. Law, Literature, and the Vanishing Real: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献