Abstract
AbstractThis article examines how fragmentation of the global trade regime into preferential agreements, built on a multilateral baseline of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, affects trade governance. The analysis relies on 105 interviews with trade policy professionals in core WTO members and a conceptual distinction between ‘thick’ and ‘thin’ institutionalism to capture institutional changes in the global trade governance architecture. The WTO's thick institutionalism facilitates institutionalized interactions among members of the trade policy community that are essential for transparency and dialogue and the rule of law character of the trade regime. It secures the continued belief of trade policy professionals in the WTO's centrality in trade governance. The thin institutionalism of the network of preferential agreements spells the return toà la carteforms of trade governance and benefits those with the technical and political capacity to successfully navigate the fragmented governance architecture. Ongoing institutional transformations shift global trade governance away from rules-based back to more power-based forms.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference52 articles.
1. WTO (2013), Fifth Appraisal of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism, WT/MIN(13)/, Ministerial Conference Bali.
2. Governance in a Partially Globalized World;Keohane;The American Political Science Review,2001
3. New Institutionalism and EU Regional Policy: Multi-level Governance by “Thin” or “Thick” Institutions?;Paraskevopoulos;Current Politics and Economics of Europe,2002
4. Low-income developing countries and WTO litigation: Why wake up the sleeping dog?
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献