Author:
BOWN CHAD P.,MAVROIDIS PETROS C.
Abstract
AbstractThe WTO's Appellate Body (AB) dealt with a number of issues for the first time in this Report. Importantly, it discussed the consistency of the European Union (EU) regulation with the multilateral rules on the conditions for deviating from the obligation to calculate individual dumping margins. Although China formally won the argument, the AB may have opened the door to treat China as a nonmarket economy (NME) even beyond 2016 when China's NME status was thought to expire under the terms of China's 2001 WTO Accession Protocol. The AB further dealt with numerous other issues ranging from statistical sampling to the treatment of confidential information. In handling its investigation, the EU authorities made a number of questionable decisions regarding the collection of information, and this aspect of the process was central to China's legal challenges.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference18 articles.
1. EC - Fasteners: Opening the Pandora's Box of Non-Market Economy Treatment
2. KAMAX (2012a), ‘Company’, available at http://www.kamax.com/en/company/, last visited 19 October 2012.
3. Regulations: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 723/2011;Official Journal of the European Union,2011
4. Tariff-jumping antidumping duties
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Trump Ended WTO Dispute Settlement. Trade Remedies are Needed to Fix it;World Trade Review;2022-02-22
2. Index;Behind-the-Border Policies;2019-11-07
3. References;Behind-the-Border Policies;2019-11-07
4. A Time for Action;Behind-the-Border Policies;2019-11-07
5. Nontariff Responses to China’s Development Strategy;Behind-the-Border Policies;2019-11-07