Abstract
AbstractFood security emerged as a major source of political deadlock in the WTO Doha Round negotiations. Concerns about food security only intensified at the WTO following the 2008 Global Food Crisis, with the Bali and Nairobi Ministerials revealing polarized views between the US and India on the financing of public food stockholding. These ‘food fights’ at the WTO have attracted significant international media, civil society, and scholarly attention. In this article, I argue that inter-state disagreement on food security is not new or specific to the Doha Round but instead has been a recurrent phenomenon in the multilateral trade system for decades. Employing an historical approach, I show that food security has repeatedly been an item of negotiation in successive GATT negotiating rounds and has been steadily codified in international trade law over time. Today, food security is deeply integrated into the rules of the trade regime, making the WTO an important yet largely unacknowledged institution in global food security governance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Negotiations on food security at the WTO: a never-ending story?;Journal of International Trade Law and Policy;2024-07-24
2. The welfare effects of partial tariff reduction in Japan;The Japanese Political Economy;2024-07-21
3. Business Ethics;Non-Governmental Organisations and International Law;2024
4. A regime complex for food assistance: international law regulating international food assistance;Journal of International Trade Law and Policy;2023-10-31
5. Shadow Negotiators;Emerg Front Glob Eco;2023-01-30