Abstract
AbstractIn 1823 the astronomer Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel gave notice of an observational error which is now known as the personal equation. Bessel, however, never used this phrase to characterize the finding that when noting the time of a certain event observers show a considerable ‘involuntary constant difference’. From this starting point the paper develops two arguments. First, these involuntary differences subverted the concept of the ‘observing observer’. What had previously been defined as a reference point of trust and precision turned into a source of an error that resisted any wilful intervention. Second, and contrary to later suggestions, Bessel's findings did not initially lead to discussions and measures of permanent control. In everyday astronomical work the influence of such differences could be avoided by comparatively simple means. Taking this into account offers a new perspective both on the history of the personal equation and on the significance of Bessel's findings. Whereas the former has to be read as the history of a rather particular reaction to the phenomenon of constant differences, the latter is connected with a rather fundamental transition in the epistemology of the observer.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History
Reference21 articles.
1. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Greenwicher Sternwarte und derer in Großbritannien überhaupt;von Lindenau;Zeitschrift für Astronomie und verwandte Wissenschaften,1816
2. The Image of Objectivity
3. Astronomical labourers: Maskelyne's assistants at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, 1765-1811
4. Ueber die Beobachtungen am Mittagsrohre;von Littrow;Zeitschrift für Astronomie und verwandte Wissenschaften,1818
5. Errors of judgement at Greenwich in 1796
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献