Abstract
AbstractThis paper examines the interrelations between astronomical images of nebulae and their observation. In particular, using the case of the ‘Great Spiral’ (M51), we follow this nebula beginning with its discovery and first sketch made by the third Earl of Rosse in 1845, to giving an account, using archival sources, of exactly how other images of the same object were produced over the years and stabilized within the record books of the Rosse project. It will be found that a particular ‘procedure’ was employed using ‘working images’ that interacted with descriptions, other images and the telescopic object itself. This stabilized not only some set of standard images of the object, but also a very potent conception of spirality as well, i.e. as a ‘normal form’. Finally, two cases will be contrasted, one being George Bond's application of this spiral conception to the nebula in Orion, and the other Wilhelm Tempel's rejection of the spiral form in M51.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Visual Grasp of the Fragmented Landscape;Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences;2018-04-01
2. Introduction: On the Visible, the Invisible, Presences and Absences in Lunar Portraiture;Selene's Two Faces;2018-01-01
3. Tribute to an Astronomer: The Work of Max Ernst on Wilhelm Tempel;Journal for the History of Astronomy;2016-05
4. Analysis and Reference in the Study of Astronomical Systems;Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics;2016
5. Models of the Skies;Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics;2016