Transactional fairness in consumer markets
-
Published:2023-08-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-23
-
ISSN:2398-063X
-
Container-title:Behavioural Public Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Behav. Public Policy
Author:
Lyons Bruce,
Sugden RobertORCID
Abstract
Abstract
There is growing public concern about the ‘unfairness’ of many pricing practices that have become common in consumer, particularly digital, markets. Industrial and behavioural economists have developed theories that explain the conditions under which these practices are profitable for firms, and their implications for consumer welfare. We identify a mismatch between the welfare economic principles used in this theoretical work and the normative perspective in which these practices are viewed as unfair. We develop a concept of ‘transactional fairness’, grounded in the normative approach of Sugden's Community of Advantage, that is reflective of public concerns. Transactional fairness is complementary to established criteria of economic efficiency and distributional equity but is based entirely on the relationship between individual buyers and sellers. It establishes clear principles with realistic information requirements that are appropriate for compliance by firms. Regulation based on this approach can help to restore public faith in markets.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Applied Psychology
Reference51 articles.
1. Preference purification and the inner rational agent: a critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics
2. How the market responds to dynamically inconsistent preferences
3. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets [Ofgem] (2019), A Guide to the Domestic Supplier-Customer Communications Rule Changes. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/2018/12/guide_to_the_customer_communications_rule_changes.pdf.
4. Guilt in Games