Abstract
Abstract
Law-enforcement agencies are increasingly able to leverage crime statistics to make risk predictions for particular individuals, employing a form of inference that some condemn as violating the right to be “treated as an individual.” I suggest that the right encodes agents’ entitlement to a fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of the rule of law. Rather than precluding statistical prediction, it requires that citizens be able to anticipate which variables will be used as predictors and act intentionally to avoid them. Furthermore, it condemns reliance on various indexes of distributive injustice, or unchosen properties, as evidence of law-breaking.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Crime Rate Prediction System -An Experiment with Denver Crime Dataset Using Machine Learning Technique;International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology;2024-07-04
2. Knowledge, algorithmic predictions, and action;Asian Journal of Philosophy;2024-06-21
3. Insights From Insurance for Fair Machine Learning;The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency;2024-06-03
4. Listening to algorithms: The case of self‐knowledge;European Journal of Philosophy;2024-01-10
5. Social Group Moral Encroachment;Episteme;2023-12