Author:
Haveman Heather A.,Joseph-Goteiner David,Li Danyang
Abstract
AbstractInstitutional logics are interrelated sets of cultural elements (norms, values, beliefs, and symbols) that help people and organizations make sense of their everyday activities and order those activities in time and space. In this paper, we describe the rise of a robust literature on institutional logics, which mostly focuses on Western societies. We then describe changes in Chinese society and economy over the past four decades, as it shifted from state-controlled planning and redistribution to market-mediated exchange. We detail how the institutional logics that guide Chinese firms have been transformed in the wake of the economic transition. The state logic, which developed in the Maoist era, valorizes equality, national community, and political stability. Although it is still in evidence, it has been partly supplanted by a market logic that encourages efficiency, competition, and property rights. But this market logic differs from the one that prevails in Western capitalist economies. The Chinese version of the market logic valorizes the central role that the state and the Communist Party continue to play in economic life. Therefore, in the Chinese version of the market logic, efficiency, competition, and property rights are tempered by a continued concern for political stability. We review and summarize the existing literature on institutional logics and Chinese firms, and then identify fruitful lines that future research could take.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Strategy and Management,Business and International Management
Reference111 articles.
1. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs
2. Does Confucianism Reduce Board Gender Diversity? Firm-Level Evidence from China
3. The Religious Question in Modern China
4. Hu, J. 2005. Zai sheng buji zhuyao lingdao ganbu tigao goujian shehui zhuyi hexie shehui nengli zhuanti yantaoban shang de jianghua (Speech at the special meeting of provincial cadres to discuss the construction of a socialist harmonious society). Renmin Ribao.
5. Whose Call to Answer: Institutional Complexity and Firms’ CSR Reporting
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献