Abstract
AbstractAll the cards seem to be stacked against belief in immortality. Nonetheless, the resources of particular religious traditions may avail where generic philosophical solutions fall short. With attention to the boredom and narcissism critiques, intimations of deathlessness in Śāntideva's radical altruism, and recent Christian debates on the soul and the intermediate state, I propose two criteria for a coherent religion-specific belief in immortality: (1) the belief is supported by a fully realized religious tradition, (2) the belief satisfies the demand for self-transcendence as well as for self-preservation. Where self-transcendence and self-preservation are kept in balance, and where the whole idea rests upon the lattice-work of a fully realized religious tradition, immortality is a fitting object of belief. Moreover, such belief is compatible with considerable speculative freedom concerning matter and spirit, body and soul, and personal identity over time.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference46 articles.
1. Skrzypek, JW (ed.) (2020) Hylomorphism: Ancient, Medieval, and Contemporary Approaches, special issue of Quaestiones Disputatae, 10.2.
2. Cassian, J (1900) Institutes 10, 2 in The Twelve Books of John Cassian on the Institutes of the Coenobia, and the Remedies for the Eight Principal Faults, A Select Library of Nicene and post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, second series, Schaff P and Wace H (eds), vol. 11. New York, NY: The Christian Literature Company, p. 267.
3. In Defense of Immortality