Author:
Renjel Robert,Eeles Eamonn
Abstract
SummaryDelirium has been associated with institutionalization, increased length of hospital stay, cognitive and functional decline and mortality. Research in the last thirty years has recognized that accurate diagnostic criteria allow for targeted interventions for those suffering from delirium. However, despite the advances made in understanding delirium, adverse outcomes persist.This article will first review how the evolution of diagnostic criteria has fostered improvements in the recognition of delirium and facilitated the development of therapeutic strategies. Second, we discuss how this foundation in approach to delirium has influenced outcomes and the evidence for causality. Finally, the candidate factors responsible for propagating adverse events are considered and future research direction outlined.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology
Reference52 articles.
1. Systematic intervention for elderly inpatients with delirium: a randomized trial;Cole;CMAJ,1994
2. Delirium and Dementia: Diagnostic Criteria and Fatality Rates
3. Shakespeare W. The Life and Death of King John; act V; scene 7; lines 13–20.
4. Representative Poetry Online – Alexander Pope: Epistles to Several Persons: Epistle to Dr Arbuthnot: complete poem and commentary. Available at: http://rpo.library.utoronto.ca/poems/epistles-several-persons-epistle-dr-arbuthnot (accessed 25 May 2014.
5. British Geriatrics Society and Royal College of Physicians of London. The prevention, diagnosis, and management of delirium in older people. Concise Guidance to Good Practice Series, No. 6. London: RCP, 2006.