Abstract
It may seem surprising that post-processual archaeology has not had any impact in France, given that much of its vocabulary has been borrowed from French intellectuals. The answer is not archaeological. It does not lie in the events of the last 20 years, which have profoundly changed the structure, practices and means of French archaeology. The problem is more fundamental, and derives from the differences of mentality and culture.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Arts and Humanities,Archeology
Reference10 articles.
1. Des intellectuels sonnants et trébuchants;Videlier;Le Monde diplomatique,1996
2. Les cosmologies des Indiens d’Amazonie;Descola;La Recherche,1996
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Les sépultures monumentales à usage collectif de Grande-Bretagne;Fonctions, utilisations et représentations de l’espace dans les sépultures monumentales du Néolithique européen;2016
2. Recent developments in later prehistoric Iberia;Antiquity;2015-10
3. Gender and Feminism in the Prehistoric Archaeology of Southwest Europe;A Companion to Gender Prehistory;2014-01-17
4. Pouvoirs, sexes et genres;Les Nouvelles de l'archéologie;2012-03-30
5. Materialism, Mode of Production, and a Millennium of Change in Southern Mexico;Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory;2011-01-15